Robert's Rules of Order West Virginia-Western Maryland Synod |
||
![]()
The Wild and Wonderful World of ProcedureIt is not uncommon to hear complaints about parliamentary
procedure, complaints ranging from, "It's confusing," to,
"It slows things down," to, "It complicates what should be
simple." We don't know whether a young Captain Henry
Martyn Robert, U.S. Army, thought the same thing before he
went in to chair his first church meeting, but he came out
convinced that he would never chair another meeting
without a grasp of parliamentary law. A few years later,
he was asked to chair another meeting meeting; this time,
however, it was worse: the participants came from all
across the United States, bringing their different local
customs, customs which did not fit together. This inspired
the now Major Robert to write his first manual of
parliamentary procedure. That's right, folks: the church
is the birth-mother of Robert's Rules of Order!
Do We Have to Use Robert's Rules of Order?Before we get into some details on Robert's Rules of
Order, we should be honest about the complaints.
People grumble about following Robert's Rules of Order.
If you dig into these complaints, what you usually find is
not a complaint about Robert's Rules of Order per se.
It's a complaint against any order, or at least, anything
that smacks of orderly order. It might be fine to do
things informally when everyone agrees, but how do we
manage disagreements? Or, to think of it another way, "If
we were all angels, we would not need the law," as Luther
quipped. Well, we are not all angels. In fact, we're
sinners, and we need rules about how we debate and decide
matters so that the sinner in each of us is restrained. That said, Robert's Rules of Order is not the
only rules that may be employed. Neither the U.S. Senate
nor the House of Representatives operate by Robert's
Rules of Order. Here are some alternatives (and by
no means the only alternatives):
Robert's Rules of Order is, however, the most
popular (as in most commonly used) parliamentary authority
(officially adopted set of procedures) in the United
States. Most civic organizations employ it. Choosing a
different parliamentary authority (or even creating your
own rules) is possible. It is, however, the prerogative of
the congregation to adopt something other than RONR,
e.g., Cushing’s, Roberta’s, Martha's,
Atwood's, etc. can all be used instead. A
body may even write its own rules of order. It is vitally
important that rules of order, once adopted, be followed.
It is also vitally important that any rules of order
adopted preserve the rights of the members both
individually and collectively. It should also be noted
that the parliamentary authority of the Congregation
Meeting is the parliamentary authority of all subordinate
boards and committees unless the constitution of the
congregation makes provision to the contrary. Before choosing an alternative to Robert's Rules of
Order, it may be wise to consult with the bishop or
the synod parliamentarian.
|
||
Couldn't find what you were looking for?Try refreshing your page. Most browsers cache pages for
faster loading. Unfortunately, when a page updates,
sometimes, your browser is pulling a saved copy of the
page from your cache. If you came here because you saw an
announcement about something being added to the page but
can't find it, it could be browser caching. By refreshing
your page, you can force your browser to download the most
recent version from the server---well, most of the time. West Virginia-Western
Maryland Synod,
℅ St. Paul Lutheran Church, 309 Baldwin Stee, Morgantown, WV 26505 304-363-4030 + Porter@WV-WMD.org |