Symposium
for Central Appalachian Lutheran Dogmatics |
|||||||||||||||
The Symposium for Central Appalachian Lutheran Dogmatics (SCALD) is designed as a day of theological discussion, employing the symposium model. Presenters give papers with discussion of those papers open to all participants. It is about providing an intellectually engaging and profitable opportunity for rank and file clergy and lay theologians (amateur and professional) to test their often private ruminations in a critical and yet convivial gathering of peers. Typically, five papers are presented over the course of the day. Sessions are not Zoomed. To date, there has been no fee for attending SCALD. Lunch is not provided, but ample time is built into the schedule for attendees to enjoy local eateries. If you would like to
receive emails about SCALD, complete this form. We also invite you to join our SCALD Facebook group (a
place we post information about events). Questions may be addressed to Bishop
Riegel (our Symposiarch). SCALD IVSCALD IV will be held Thursday, 20 February 2025.
Tentatively, it is scheduled for Morgantown, WV. More
details to come. In the meantime, you can RSVP through
our online SCALD IV
registration form. Stay tuned, and join our email list. PapersThe following have been accepted for SCALD IV: "Disputation on Offering the Sacrament
of Holy Communion to the Unbaptized" by Keith
Christian
Those who are unbaptized should not be offered the sacrament of Holy Communion, as it disturbs the logical, theological order of the two sacraments. Some Lutheran pastors and churches have discussed offering an "open table" of Holy Communion to anyone, including to those who have not been baptized. This disputation will review the scriptures and the Lutheran orthodox theology to arrive at a position that those who are unbaptized should not be offered the sacrament of Holy Communion and that one needs to be baptized prior to partaking of the Eucharist. "A Confessional Reappraisal: Dialogue between the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod" by Thomas Johnston
Within the Lutheran theological tradition in the United States, there is no greater divergence than the interpretation of the Lutheran Confessions. The Lutheran Confessions contain the writings of Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, and the other Lutheran theologians grounded in the theological statement of justified by grace through faith. While Lutherans in the United States profess this same doctrinal statement, they diverge on the best way of approaching the Confessions themselves. The Lutheran Confessions provide the framework for Lutheran doctrine and more importantly how the different Lutheran bodies approach the Confessions. Several Lutheran bodies utilize the adjective confessional to distinguish themselves from other Lutherans; however, by adopting this label, conversation between different church bodies has failed. The two Lutheran church bodies that have significant mass in the United States are the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. As the United States is slowly entering into a post-Christian era, the need for fuller cooperation between divergent bodies is paramount, especially among traditions that share a common theological heritage. Given that the Lutheran Confessions provide the bedrock of Lutheran doctrine, it would make the most sense for that as the starting point of conversation. The goal of this paper is to provide a framework for inter-Lutheran dialogue between the ELCA and LCMS churches starting with the Confessions at the local level by establishing a common language. One of the implications from this project is decreasing tensions between the two church bodies and encourage further conversations. "Quo jure et quo modo? The Cleric Speaking in the Status Politicus" by Matthew Riegel
The typical arguments for and against the church's engagement (and that of its agents) in civil politics rarely consider the possibility of a de jure humano claim. Augustana XXVIII's critique of the prince-bishops' claim that they wield temporal authority de jure divino, provides a schema for thinking about the participation of an ecclesiastical institution and its agents in the political discourse of a republic, assuming incorporation confers legal personhood. If it can be argued that the church (and its agents) have a right to exercise political powers in the political estate, the question of means or method remains. Here too Augustana XXVIII's critique of the confusing of the power of the keys and the power of the sword provides a schema. This paper will argue for applicability of Augustana XXVIII near five hundred years after its penning and for its utility when understood within the context of then contemporary political theory and the organization of the church into three estates. Matthew Riegel is bishop of the West Virginia-Western Maryland Synod, ELCA, and serves on the ELCA's Task Force for the development of a social statement on civic life and faith. "Paved with Good Intentions: Reexamining Supersessionism" by Tony Setley Although rarely named outright in theological works promoting the concept, hard and soft Supersessionism appears as normative thought from the Scriptures, Church Fathers, Reformers, and most sides of the catholic faith until the mid-20th Century. This paper will explore the earlier works, with added focus on the views of our Lutheran confessions and early Lutheran theologians. It will also highlight the shift toward a rejection of the concept in modern, mainstream Lutheranism and seek to answer the question, “does any of this matter?” Tony Setley serves as Pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church, Morgantown. He also is the State Chaplain for the American Legion in West Virginia and a law enforcement chaplain. "The Status Intermedius in the Lutheran Dogmatic Tradition" by Jaren Summers
This paper will detail the status intermedius as it has been discussed in the Lutheran dogmatic tradition. The paper will follow a chronological order by reviewing Luther's position(s) before discussing the Confessions in depth. Then, I will proceed to discuss what Dogmatic theologians have discussed up to the present day, including, but not limited to, Hunnius, Schmid, Jacobs, Voigt, LCMS official declarations, and ELCA declarations. I will be reviewing the dogmatic tradition as it was developed in Europe and spread throughout the US. The conclusion will show that the status intermedius has been a part of the Lutheran dogmatic tradition with several exceptions/caveats. FormatFive papers have been accepted for SCALD IV. Each paper will be given roughly 20 minutes of oral presentation followed by roughly 40 minutes for questions and conversation.SCALD VWe don't yet know when SCALD V will be held, but we do already have notice of two paper proposals. Follow us on Facebook and subscribe to our mailing list. Click here.Past SCALDs
SCALD III
|
Brian McClinton, at SCALD II, leads the gathering in singing hymns of the Christian Science tradition as an example of catechetical hymnody. |
SCALD II, meeting in Keyser, WV, on 21 Feb 2019,
saw a doubling of attendance over SCALD I, with thirty
participating, representing six ELCA judicatories
(WV-WMD, LSS, Allegheny, MNYS, NC, and Del-MD). There
were two non-ELCA folks there (TEC and UCC). There were
six laity and twenty-four clergy. One of the lay
participants, a seminarian from LSTC, even road the
train overnight to attend.
SCALD II papers...
Elizabeth Hadaway, at SCALD I, delivering her paper, "The Babylonian Captivity of the Clergy Spouse," a very interesting critique of commonly held ideas about the role of the clergy spouse in light of Augustana XIV, XVI, and XXIII. |
SCALD I met in Morgantown, WV, in 2017 with fifteen
present. While predominantly pastors of the West
Virginia-Western Maryland Synod, we also had a pastor from
Lower Susquehanna join us and two priests from the
Episcopal Diocese of WV.
SCALD I papers...
A wide variety of educational opportunities for both
clergy and laity are to be found on the WV-WMD Synod's Education for Clergy & Laity
page.